On Fri, May 06, 2016 at 03:07:04AM +0000, Kershner, David A wrote: > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Greg KH [mailto:gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] > > Sent: Thursday, May 5, 2016 9:46 PM > > To: Kershner, David A <David.Kershner@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: driverdev-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; *S-Par-Maintainer > > <SParMaintainer@xxxxxxxxxx>; Arfvidson, Erik > > <Erik.Arfvidson@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: unisys: fix format string %Lx to %llx for u64 > > > > On Thu, May 05, 2016 at 10:25:59PM -0400, David Kershner wrote: > > > From: Erik Arfvidson <erik.arfvidson@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > this patch fixes the following sonarqube issue. > > > %Lx in format string (no. 1) requires 'unsigned long long' > > > but the argument type is 'unsigned long long' > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Erik Arfvidson <erik.arfvidson@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > Signed-off-by: David Kershner <david.kershner@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > drivers/staging/unisys/visorbus/visorbus_main.c | 10 +++++----- > > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > > > > > Please send patches as series, otherwise I have no idea what order to > > apply them, so I'll just give up and delete them all from my queue. > > > > You know better than this :( > > > > Sorry, didn't send as a series cause they can be applied independently of > each other. How am I supposed to know that? Would you like to be on the receiving end of a random assortment of patches with no way to know if they are independant or not? > Should I consider all the patches sent dropped and send as a series > this time? Yes please. thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
