Re: [PATCH 05/15] staging: lustre: ldlm: use accessor macros for l_flags

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Wow! I remember this stuff, even if from 3 years ago. Feels like a lifetime. Is this patch being applied to official Linux, hence this message? Xyratex collapsed, shed a mess of employees and sold the remnant to Seagate. Consequently, I don't really follow Lustre any more. Sorry.

On 04/27/16 15:20, James Simmons wrote:
From: Bruce Korb <bruce.korb@xxxxxxxxx>

Convert most of the ldlm lock's l_flags references from direct
bit twiddling to using bit specific macros.  A few multi-bit
operations are left as an exercise for the reader.

The changes are mostly in ldlm, but also in llite, osc and quota.
Also add a multi-bit (mask) test.

Signed-off-by: Bruce Korb <bruce.korb@xxxxxxxxx>
Intel-bug-id: https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-2906
Reviewed-by: Keith Mannthey <Keith.Mannthey@xxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-on: http://review.whamcloud.com/7963
Reviewed-by: Doug Oucharek <doug.s.oucharek@xxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: James Simmons <jsimmons@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  .../lustre/lustre/include/lustre_dlm_flags.h       |    3 +
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux