On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 5:36 AM, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 02:24:47AM +0900, Mark Laws wrote: >> Sorry, I don't understand--which part are you suggesting we remove? > > The call to i8042_controller_check() or move it to the probe function or > something. Why must we have the hardware to load the module? We don't. That's the point of the patch. Do you mean that since our intent is to load the module regardless of whether or not the hardware is there, the check should be (re)moved simply to clarify the code? Sorry for the stupid questions--I'm just trying to make sure I understand you correctly! Regards, Mark Laws -- |v\ /\ |\ |< |_ /\ \^| // _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
