On Fri, 2016-04-01 at 15:58 +0000, Simmons, James A. wrote: > > When would be an appropriate time to submit patches similar to > > below that individually remove various typedefs from lustre code? > > > > These are pretty trivial to produce and verify so there's no > > particular hurry to do them now but applying them will require > > resync points for active and actually useful developers. > Actually could you hold off for the LNet core and LND drivers these > changes. I have plans to push a few more LNet patches soon. I have > been just waiting for everyone to figure out how to deal with the > latest changes to the infinband layer first. Sure. No worries. > There are a few typedefs like lnet_nid_t I like to keep or if it has to > be changed turn it into a struct then. Things like lnet_nid_t act like > a cookie handle. Fine by me. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
