Re: [PATCH] dma-buf: Update docs for SYNC ioctl

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 03/23/2016 12:42 PM, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 04:32:59PM +0100, David Herrmann wrote:
Hi

On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 12:56 PM, Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 12:30:42PM +0100, David Herrmann wrote:
My question was rather about why we do this? Semantics for EINTR are
well defined, and with SA_RESTART (default on linux) user-space can
ignore it. However, looping on EAGAIN is very uncommon, and it is not
at all clear why it is needed?

Returning an error to user-space makes sense if user-space has a
reason to react to it. I fail to see how EAGAIN on a cache-flush/sync
operation helps user-space at all? As someone without insight into the
driver implementation, it is hard to tell why.. Any hints?

The reason we return EAGAIN is to workaround a deadlock we face when
blocking on the GPU holding the struct_mutex (inside the client's
process), but the GPU is dead. As our locking is very, very coarse we
cannot restart the GPU without acquiring the struct_mutex being held by
the client so we wake the client up and tell them the resource they are
waiting on (the flush of the object from the GPU into the CPU domain) is
temporarily unavailable. If they try to immediately wait upon the ioctl
again, they are blocked waiting for the reset to occur before they may
complete their flush. There are a few other possible deadlocks that are
also avoided with EAGAIN (again, the issue is more or less the lack of
fine grained locking).

...so you hijacked EAGAIN for all DRM ioctls just for a driver
workaround?

No, we utilized the fact that EAGAIN was already enshrined by libdrm as
the defacto mechanism for repeating the ioctl in order to repeat the
ioctl for a driver workaround.

Do we have an agreement here after all? David? I need to know whether this fixup is okay to go cause I'll need to submit to Chrome OS then.

Best Regards,

Tiago

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux