> Fixed Multiple FSF address checkpatch warnings to conform to kernel coding style. > > Parth Sane (5): > staging: rtl8712: Fixed FSF address warning in basic_types.h > staging: rtl8712: Fixed FSF address warning in drv_types.h > staging: rtl9712: Fixed FSF address warning in ethernet.h > staging: rtl9712: Fixed FSF address warning in hal_init.c > staging: rtl9712: Fixed FSF address warning in ieee80211.c > > drivers/staging/rtl8712/basic_types.h | 4 ---- > drivers/staging/rtl8712/drv_types.h | 4 ---- > drivers/staging/rtl8712/ethernet.h | 4 ---- > drivers/staging/rtl8712/hal_init.c | 4 ---- > drivers/staging/rtl8712/ieee80211.c | 4 ---- > 5 files changed, 20 deletions(-) > > -- > 1.9.1 Hi, The thing is all these patches are related and have a cover letter explaining changes. But this seems to be a trivial change which is self explanatory. This should possibly suffice. What do you think? Regards, Parth Sane
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel