On Mar 12, 2016, at 1:23 PM, Joe Perches wrote: > On Sat, 2016-03-12 at 13:00 -0500, James Simmons wrote: >> From: James Nunez <james.a.nunez@xxxxxxxxx> >> >> This is one of the fixes broken out of patch 10000 that was >> missed in the merger. With this fix the CERROR called in >> sfw_handle_server_rpc will print out correctly. > > Speaking of CERROR and logging, it it really useful > for each CERROR use to have 2 static structs? > > In CERROR -> CDEBUG_LIMIT there is a: > static struct cfs_debug_limit_state cdls; > (12 or 16 bytes depending on 32/64 bit arch) > > and in CDEBUG_LIMIT -> _CDEBUG > static struct libcfs_debug_msg_data msgdata; > (24 or 36 bytes depending on 32/64 bit arch) > > That seems a largish bit of data and code to initialize > these structs for over a thousand call sites. > > Wouldn't a single static suffice? Single static would not work because the code is parallel so it'll stomp over each other. or do you mean to have a common structure for every callsite (but instantiated separately)? This used to be a local structure in the past, but that caused considerable stack growth for some functions, that added up along the call chain, and that was the solution we came up with that did help. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
