Re: [PATCH] staging: rtl8712: added few code enhancements in rtl8712_led.c

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 03/09/2016 03:54 PM, Claudiu Beznea wrote:
This patch tries to improve a part of the code from
rtl8712_led.c by removing duplicates condition checks.

Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@xxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/staging/rtl8712/rtl8712_led.c | 31 +++++++++++++++----------------
  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8712/rtl8712_led.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8712/rtl8712_led.c
index 9055827..aea6f2d 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rtl8712/rtl8712_led.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8712/rtl8712_led.c
@@ -221,11 +221,9 @@ static void SwLedBlink(struct LED_871x *pLed)
  		break;
  	case LED_BLINK_StartToBlink:
  		if (check_fwstate(pmlmepriv, _FW_LINKED) &&
-		    (pmlmepriv->fw_state & WIFI_STATION_STATE))
-			bStopBlinking = true;
-		if (check_fwstate(pmlmepriv, _FW_LINKED) &&
-		    ((pmlmepriv->fw_state & WIFI_ADHOC_STATE) ||
-		    (pmlmepriv->fw_state & WIFI_ADHOC_MASTER_STATE)))
+			((pmlmepriv->fw_state & WIFI_STATION_STATE) ||
+			 (pmlmepriv->fw_state & WIFI_ADHOC_STATE)	||
+			 (pmlmepriv->fw_state & WIFI_ADHOC_MASTER_STATE)))

The above hunk messes up the alignment of the if statement. Observe the alignment of the stuff you are removing. It is correct.


Other than the alignment above, the rest of the patch is correct.

Larry

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux