>On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 06:11:07AM +0000, Drokin, Oleg wrote: >> >> On Feb 26, 2016, at 1:03 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: >> >> > On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 08:07:06PM -0500, James Simmons wrote: >> >> The module information for Lustre is stale or in some cases >> >> completely missing. This collection of patches brings the >> >> modinfo up to date as well as filling in any missing information. >> >> This patch set has been redone to rebase it on Oleg's latest >> >> patch set to avoid collisons in merging. >> >> >> >> Andreas Dilger (4): >> >> staging: lustre: add missing MODULE_AUTHOR for LNet selftest module >> >> staging: lustre: update the MODULE_DESCRIPTION for all lustre modules >> >> staging: lustre: make module_init/exit naming consistent >> >> staging: lustre: update comment for lnet_lib_init/exit >> >> >> >> James Simmons (2): >> >> staging: lustre: move module info to end of libcfs module.c file >> >> staging: lustre: update the MODULE_VERSION for all lustre modules >> > >> > What changed to need a v2 of this series? >> > >> > Please ALWAYS say what the difference is, don't expect us to "just >> > know". >> > >> > Please send a v3 of this, describing the changes, in the correct format, >> > in each patch. You know better than this… >> >> I think it says above that the rebase was done on top of my patchset >> to resolve the conflict that arose? > >Where? Ugh, yeah, kind of, but where is the big v2: marking or some >such thing like is required? It's very easy to miss this (as I did.) >Please make it easy for maintainers, not hard on them... Sorry, in the future I will add a ChangeLog section for newer versions of patches. The good news is the patches from Oleg's that conflicted landed already which means the this patch set is ready to land. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
