From: Oleg Drokin <green@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
This patch fixes "Block comments use a trailing */ on a separate line"
warnings from checkpatch.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Drokin <green@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/fld/fld_cache.c | 9 ++++++---
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/fld/fld_internal.h | 24 ++++++++----------------
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/fld/fld_request.c | 9 ++++++---
3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/fld/fld_cache.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/fld/fld_cache.c
index a7026a9..2b09b76 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/fld/fld_cache.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/fld/fld_cache.c
@@ -183,7 +183,8 @@ restart_fixup:
}
/* we could have overlap over next
- * range too. better restart. */
+ * range too. better restart.
+ */
goto restart_fixup;
}
@@ -302,7 +303,8 @@ static void fld_cache_overlap_handle(struct fld_cache *cache,
const u32 mdt = range->lsr_index;
/* this is overlap case, these case are checking overlapping with
- * prev range only. fixup will handle overlapping with next range. */
+ * prev range only. fixup will handle overlapping with next range.
+ */
if (f_curr->fce_range.lsr_index == mdt) {
f_curr->fce_range.lsr_start = min(f_curr->fce_range.lsr_start,
@@ -317,7 +319,8 @@ static void fld_cache_overlap_handle(struct fld_cache *cache,
} else if (new_start <= f_curr->fce_range.lsr_start &&
f_curr->fce_range.lsr_end <= new_end) {
/* case 1: new range completely overshadowed existing range.
- * e.g. whole range migrated. update fld cache entry */
+ * e.g. whole range migrated. update fld cache entry
+ */
f_curr->fce_range = *range;
kfree(f_new);
diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/fld/fld_internal.h b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/fld/fld_internal.h
index ee36d6b..e8a3caf 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/fld/fld_internal.h
+++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/fld/fld_internal.h
@@ -67,8 +67,7 @@ struct lu_fld_hash {
struct fld_cache_entry {
struct list_head fce_lru;
struct list_head fce_list;
- /**
- * fld cache entries are sorted on range->lsr_start field. */
+ /** fld cache entries are sorted on range->lsr_start field. */
struct lu_seq_range fce_range;
};
@@ -79,32 +78,25 @@ struct fld_cache {
*/
rwlock_t fci_lock;
- /**
- * Cache shrink threshold */
+ /** Cache shrink threshold */
int fci_threshold;
- /**
- * Preferred number of cached entries */
+ /** Preferred number of cached entries */
int fci_cache_size;
- /**
- * Current number of cached entries. Protected by \a fci_lock */
+ /** Current number of cached entries. Protected by \a fci_lock */
int fci_cache_count;
- /**
- * LRU list fld entries. */
+ /** LRU list fld entries. */
struct list_head fci_lru;
- /**
- * sorted fld entries. */
+ /** sorted fld entries. */
struct list_head fci_entries_head;
- /**
- * Cache statistics. */
+ /** Cache statistics. */
struct fld_stats fci_stat;
- /**
- * Cache name used for debug and messages. */
+ /** Cache name used for debug and messages. */
char fci_name[LUSTRE_MDT_MAXNAMELEN];
unsigned int fci_no_shrink:1;
};
diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/fld/fld_request.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/fld/fld_request.c
index 0f0fbe4..b50a57b 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/fld/fld_request.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/fld/fld_request.c
@@ -58,7 +58,8 @@
#include "fld_internal.h"
/* TODO: these 3 functions are copies of flow-control code from mdc_lib.c
- * It should be common thing. The same about mdc RPC lock */
+ * It should be common thing. The same about mdc RPC lock
+ */
static int fld_req_avail(struct client_obd *cli, struct mdc_cache_waiter *mcw)
{
int rc;
@@ -124,7 +125,8 @@ fld_rrb_scan(struct lu_client_fld *fld, u64 seq)
* it should go to index 0 directly, instead of calculating
* hash again, and also if other MDTs is not being connected,
* the fld lookup requests(for seq on MDT0) should not be
- * blocked because of other MDTs */
+ * blocked because of other MDTs
+ */
if (fid_seq_is_norm(seq))
hash = fld_rrb_hash(fld, seq);
else
@@ -139,7 +141,8 @@ again:
if (hash != 0) {
/* It is possible the remote target(MDT) are not connected to
* with client yet, so we will refer this to MDT0, which should
- * be connected during mount */
+ * be connected during mount
+ */
hash = 0;
goto again;
}
--
2.1.0
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
