On Feb 16, 2016, at 12:55 AM, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-02-16 at 00:47 -0500, green@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> From: Oleg Drokin <green@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> This pacifies checkpatch amongst other things, also is shorter to write
>> and avoiding calls to printk_ratelimit() is also good.
> []
>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/libcfs/linux/linux-tracefile.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/libcfs/linux/linux-tracefile.c
> []
>> @@ -244,11 +244,11 @@ void cfs_print_to_console(struct ptldebug_header *hdr, int mask,
>> }
>>
>> if ((mask & D_CONSOLE) != 0) {
>> - printk("%s%s: %.*s", ptype, prefix, len, buf);
>> + pr_err("%s%s: %.*s", ptype, prefix, len, buf);
>> } else {
>> - printk("%s%s: %d:%d:(%s:%d:%s()) %.*s", ptype, prefix,
>> - hdr->ph_pid, hdr->ph_extern_pid, file, hdr->ph_line_num,
>> - fn, len, buf);
>> + pr_warn("%s%s: %d:%d:(%s:%d:%s()) %.*s", ptype, prefix,
>> + hdr->ph_pid, hdr->ph_extern_pid, file, hdr->ph_line_num,
>> + fn, len, buf);
>> }
>> }
>
> This breaks the currently correct output.
Hm, you are right. Thanks!
I guess this patch just needs some redoing.
Greg, if you can skip this patch but still apply the rest of the series, that would be great.
I just tested that the whole thing builds and runs fine with this patch omitted.
Bye,
Oleg
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
