On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 10:46:57PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > On Sun, Feb 07, 2016 at 02:04:21PM -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 04:22:33PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > > > The success path and the error path both are first doing > > > spin_unlock_irqrestore() before returning. Use that in the common path > > > and return the success/error value. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > > > > v2: changed label name > > > > > > It is dependent on the patch series sent by Benjamin (Nov 30th). > > > > Which didn't get applied, so can you resend this after that does get > > accepted? > > oops, i dont think i have the patch anymore. But looking at the commit > message, i think i just sent the same suggestion to Benjamin for his > [PATCH v3 13/14] staging: unisys: fix else statement in visornic_main.c > > If he is not changing then I will create the patch and send you. Hi Greg, I will not be resending this patch as Ben is against to using goto. regards sudip _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
