> -----Original Message----- > From: Greg KH [mailto:gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Sunday, February 07, 2016 9:34 PM > To: Lijun Pan <Lijun.Pan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: arnd@xxxxxxxx; devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux- > kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; bhamciu1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; Lijun.Pan2000@xxxxxxxxx; > bhupesh.sharma@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; german.rivera@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; > agraf@xxxxxxx; stuart.yoder@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; nir.erez@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; > itai.katz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; scottwood@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; leoli@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; > R89243@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx; > richard.schmitt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v2 1/8] staging: fsl-mc: static inline function to > differentiate root dprc > > On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 01:25:47PM -0600, Lijun Pan wrote: > > Define a static inline function is_root_dprc(dev) to tell whether a > > device is root dprc or not via platform_bus_type. > > Remove fsl_mc_is_root_dprc() because is_root_dprc() is simpler and > > easier to understand. > > > > Signed-off-by: Lijun Pan <Lijun.Pan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > v2: use static inline function instead of macro > > replace the fsl_mc_is_root_dprc with is_root_dprc > > > This series doesn't apply to my tree anymore, due to another big patcheset for > this subsystem being applied. Can you please rebase it against my staging- > testing branch of staging.git and resend? > Greg, I have just rebased the patches and re-sended the v3. Please check your emails. Thanks Lijun > thanks, > > greg k-h _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
