Hi Maarten, 2016-02-02 Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > Op 02-02-16 om 14:23 schreef Gustavo Padovan: > > From: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Making fence_info a pointer enables us to extend the struct in the future > > without breaking the ABI. > > > > v2: use type __u64 for fence_info > > Signed-off-by: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > drivers/staging/android/sync.c | 2 +- > > drivers/staging/android/uapi/sync.h | 2 +- > > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/android/sync.c b/drivers/staging/android/sync.c > > index f7530f0..03b1214 100644 > > --- a/drivers/staging/android/sync.c > > +++ b/drivers/staging/android/sync.c > > @@ -525,7 +525,7 @@ static long sync_file_ioctl_fence_info(struct sync_file *sync_file, > > if (info->status >= 0) > > info->status = !info->status; > > > > - len = sizeof(struct sync_file_info); > > + len = sizeof(struct sync_file_info) - sizeof(__u64); > > > > for (i = 0; i < sync_file->num_fences; ++i) { > > struct fence *fence = sync_file->cbs[i].fence; > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/android/uapi/sync.h b/drivers/staging/android/uapi/sync.h > > index ed281fc..8e2ed32 100644 > > --- a/drivers/staging/android/uapi/sync.h > > +++ b/drivers/staging/android/uapi/sync.h > > @@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ struct sync_file_info { > > char name[32]; > > __s32 status; > > > > - __u8 fence_info[0]; > > + __u64 fence_info; > > > With the information from the commit I would expect fence_info would be a true pointer. I missed that. It is fixed for v3 now. > > so if (sync_file_info->num_fences == 0) not copying fence_info, but set all members including this one. > else for_all_fences() copy_to_user(fence_info struct) > > Otherwise you still can't extend the struct without breaking the abi. all sync_files have at least 1 fence so we are left to the else case, coupy all fences to the user. So we always have variable length at the end of the struct. But I still don't see how this will prevent us from breaking the API. Gustavo _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel