On Sat, 2016-01-30 at 18:12 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> We could make checkpatch.pl not complain if the line says checkpatch:
> on
> it. It would look like this.
>
> - in_voltage-voltage_thresh_low_value,
> + in_voltage-voltage_thresh_low_value, /* checkpatch:
> not math */
>
> I suppose I could have made the explanation longer since the it won't
> complain about the 80 character limit... What do yo/u guys think?
Maybe use a more generic thing like the checkpatch type
in_voltage-voltage_thresh_low_value, /* checkpatch-SPACING */
Even so, it might uglify checkpatch code a lot to
check something like this per-line or per-block.
And that likely would have to be per line in the
code as checkpatch couldn't see when a patch block
addition occurs outside the scope of a comment.
I suppose inside checkpatch the "sub report {"
function could be extended to look at the specific
$rawline being tested for any "checkpatch" comment
and if so, test if it's the specific $type.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
