Hi Joe, On Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 12:28 PM, Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sat, 2016-01-30 at 10:17 +1100, Julian Calaby wrote: >> On Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 5:00 AM, Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > Bhaktipriya Shridhar <bhaktipriya96@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >> > > This patch fixes checkpatch.pl warning in rtw_mlme_ext.c file. >> > > WARNING: void function return statements are not generally useful > [] >> > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723au/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723au/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c > [] >> > > @@ -2657,7 +2657,6 @@ static void issue_probersp(struct rtw_adapter *padapter, unsigned char *da) >> > > >> > > dump_mgntframe23a(padapter, pmgntframe); >> > > >> > > - return; >> > > } >> > >> > If you insist on pushing this rather unncessary change, please do it >> > properly, and remove the blank line before the return statement as well. >> >> As Jes said, you need to remove the blank lines before the returns >> too. checkpatch should have picked this up, you did run the patch >> through checkpatch before you sent it, right? > > checkpatch doesn't pick this up. > > If you'd like to make it do so, you're welcome to try > but it's likely a bit more complicated than it appears. I meant the extra blank lines, not the useless return statements. Thanks, -- Julian Calaby Email: julian.calaby@xxxxxxxxx Profile: http://www.google.com/profiles/julian.calaby/ _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
