On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 06:10:40PM -0200, Gustavo Padovan wrote: > 2016-01-19 Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx>: > > - get_timeline_name and get_driver_name are imo too much indirection, just > > add ->(drv_)name field to each of these. > > I don't think is a good idea to change that now as there are other fence > users in the kernel using get_timeline_name and get_driver_name. What I > propose is try get rid of this when moving ops from fences to > fence_timeline. Makes sense. And yeah I only realized after sending that this wasn't added by your patches, just that your patches added the (core) users for it. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
