Hi Sven, On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 2:29 AM, Sven Dziadek <sven.dziadek@xxxxxx> wrote: > diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723au/hal/rtl8723a_cmd.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723au/hal/rtl8723a_cmd.c > index 1662c03c..57f5941 100644 > --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723au/hal/rtl8723a_cmd.c > +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723au/hal/rtl8723a_cmd.c > @@ -93,11 +93,9 @@ int FillH2CCmd(struct rtw_adapter *padapter, u8 ElementID, u32 CmdLen, > > if (h2c_cmd & BIT(7)) { > msgbox_ex_addr = REG_HMEBOX_EXT_0 + (h2c_box_num * EX_MESSAGE_BOX_SIZE); > - h2c_cmd_ex = le16_to_cpu(h2c_cmd_ex); > rtl8723au_write16(padapter, msgbox_ex_addr, h2c_cmd_ex); > } > msgbox_addr = REG_HMEBOX_0 + (h2c_box_num * MESSAGE_BOX_SIZE); > - h2c_cmd = le32_to_cpu(h2c_cmd); > rtl8723au_write32(padapter, msgbox_addr, h2c_cmd); While Jes has NACK'd this change, it does highlight that the h2c_cmd and h2c_cmd_ex variables are being used to hold both cpu-endian and little-endian data. A worthwhile change here might be to move the conversion into the function call following these lines so that they remain "clean". That said, I'm not sure this particular snippet of code would work on big-endian at all as I'm pretty sure that BIT() produces cpu-endian values and we know from the line you remove that h2c_cmd is little-endian at this point. Thanks, -- Julian Calaby Email: julian.calaby@xxxxxxxxx Profile: http://www.google.com/profiles/julian.calaby/ _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel