Re: [PATCH 3/6] Staging: gdm72xx: Add appropriate comment for spinlock_t definition

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Dec 27, 2015 at 02:44:42AM +0530, shraddha.6596@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> From: Shraddha Barke <shraddha.6596@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Fix checkpatch issue: "CHECK: spinlock_t definition without comment".
> 
> Signed-off-by: Shraddha Barke <shraddha.6596@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---

This will also not apply because of:
2bc29a1abc5c ("staging: gdm72xx: Replace timeval with ktime_t")

regards
sudip
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux