Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] Staging: dgnc: dgnc_neo.c: usleep_range is preferred over udelay

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 08:10:42PM +0530, Nizam Haider wrote:
> Fix ceckpatch warning

spelling?

> 
> Signed-off-by: Nizam Haider <nijamh@xxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/dgnc/dgnc_neo.c | 10 +++++-----
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/dgnc/dgnc_neo.c b/drivers/staging/dgnc/dgnc_neo.c
> index 8106f52..cf5bfc7 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/dgnc/dgnc_neo.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/dgnc/dgnc_neo.c
> @@ -1335,7 +1335,7 @@ static void neo_flush_uart_write(struct channel_t *ch)
>  		/* Check to see if the UART feels it completely flushed the FIFO. */
>  		tmp = readb(&ch->ch_neo_uart->isr_fcr);
>  		if (tmp & 4)
> -			udelay(10);
> +			usleep_range(10, 50);

Where did you get this range from?  Did you make it up?  Please don't.

greg k-h
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux