Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] Patch series to make lustre safe(r) for W=1 compiles

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 06:04:19PM -0500, Valdis Kletnieks wrote:
> Start of a batch series to clean up the Lustre tree. Other people have
> done some sparse and checkpatch cleanups, but I found a bunch of
> stuff building with W=1. There's probably more, but this was the
> really low-hanging obvious fruit.
> 
> Valdis Kletnieks (6):
>   staging/lustre: Silence warning about 'inline'
>   staging/lustre: Fix set-but-unused whinge.
>   staging/lustre: Clean up another C warnining: set but not used
>   staging/lustre: Fix another C compiler whine: set but not used
>   staging/lustre: Nuke an unsigned >= 0 assert
>   staging/lustre: Nuke another unsigned >= 0 assert

These subject names don't match what you actually sent out, the 'prefix'
got stripped.  Please resend them all so that I can properly apply them.

thanks,

greg k-h
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux