On Sun, Nov 08, 2015 at 11:34:55AM -0500, James Simmons wrote: > For UMP and SMP machines the struct cfs_cpt_table are > defined differently. In the case handled by this patch > nodemask is defined as a integer for the UMP case and > as a pointer for the SMP case. This will cause a problem > for ost_setup which reads the nodemask directly. Instead > we create a UMP version of cfs_cpt_nodemask and use that > in ost_setup. > > Signed-off-by: James Simmons <uja.ornl@xxxxxxxxx> > Intel-bug-id: https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-4199 > Reviewed-on: http://review.whamcloud.com/9219 > Reviewed-by: Liang Zhen <liang.zhen@xxxxxxxxx> > Reviewed-by: Li Xi <pkuelelixi@xxxxxxxxx> > Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@xxxxxxxxx> > > Starting in 3.14 kernels nodemask_t was changed from a > a unsigned long to a linux bitmap so more than 32 cores > could be supported. Using set_bit in cfs_cpt_table_alloc > no longer compiles so this patch backports bits of the > node management function that use a linux bitmap back > end. Cleaned up libcfs bitmap.h to use the libcfs layers > memory allocation function. This was pulling in lustre > related code that was not defined. > > Signed-off-by: James Simmons <uja.ornl@xxxxxxxxx> > Intel-bug-id: https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-4993 > Reviewed-on: http://review.whamcloud.com/10332 > Reviewed-by: Liang Zhen <liang.zhen@xxxxxxxxx> > Reviewed-by: Bob Glossman <bob.glossman@xxxxxxxxx> > Reviewed-by: Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@xxxxxxxxx> What is with this crazy two sections of signed-off-by? If this was 2 patches, make it two patches. If not, then don't do this. Also, this whole series had no numbering, so I don't know how to apply them, please fix and resend it. thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
