On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 01:12:14AM -0500, ira.weiny wrote: > Greg, Doug, > > As mentioned below, these patches depend on the new rdmavt library submitted to > Doug on linux-rdma. > > We continue to identify (and rework) patches by our other developers which can > be submitted without conflicts with this series. Furthermore, We have, as much > as possible, placed fixes directly into rdmavt such that those changes can be > dropped from hfi1. But at this point, we need to know if and where these are > going to land so that we can start reworking as appropriate. > > Therefore, I would like to discuss plans to get hfi1 under the same maintainer > to work through this transitional period. > > Basically, At what point should we stop submitting patches to Greg and start > submitting to Doug? > > Should we consider the merge window itself as the swap over point and submit > changes to Doug at that point? If so, should we continue to submit what we can > to Greg until then (and continue rebase'ing the series below on that work)? Or > given Gregs backlog, should we stop submitting to Greg sometime prior to the > merge window? > > That brings up my final question, at the point of swap over I assume anything > not accepted by Greg should be considered rejected and we need to resubmit to > Doug? If Doug accepts the library changes, let me know that public git commit and I can pull it into the staging-next branch and you can continue to send me staging patches that way. That's the easiest thing to do usually. thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
