> -----Original Message----- > From: Thomas Gleixner [mailto:tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Saturday, December 19, 2015 3:27 AM > To: KY Srinivasan <kys@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Jake Oshins <jakeo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux- > kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; olaf@xxxxxxxxx; > apw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; vkuznets@xxxxxxxxxx; Haiyang Zhang > <haiyangz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx; > bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx; linux-pci@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: RE: [PATCH v9 0/7] PCI: hv: New paravirtual PCI front-end for Hyper- > V VMs > > On Tue, 15 Dec 2015, KY Srinivasan wrote: > > > > Of these 7 patches, Greg has committed all of the VMBUS > > related supporting patches (3 patches). Thomas, can you > > take the IRQ related patches through your tree. > > That does not make any sense. > > > > Jake Oshins (7): > > > drivers:hv: Export a function that maps Linux CPU num onto Hyper-V > > > proc num > > > drivers:hv: Export hv_do_hypercall() > > > PCI: Make it possible to implement a PCI MSI IRQ Domain in a module. > > > PCI: Add fwnode_handle to pci_sysdata > > > PCI: irqdomain: Look up IRQ domain by fwnode_handle > > > drivers:hv: Define the channel type of Hyper-V PCI Express > > > pass-through > > > PCI: hv: New paravirtual PCI front-end for Hyper-V VMs > > That series cannot be ripped apart. The PCI part does not even compile > w/o the drivers/hv part in place. What I was proposing was that after you pick up the hv related patches in Greg's tree in the next cycle, would you be willing to take the IRQ related patches through your tree. Sorry for the confusion. Regards, K. Y _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
