On Tue, 2015-12-15 at 17:41 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 06:27:56AM -0800, Joe Perches wrote: > > On Sun, 2015-12-13 at 14:52 +0100, SF Markus Elfring wrote: > > > From: Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2015 09:30:47 +0100 > > > > > > Six goto statements referred to a source code position directly behind them. > > > Thus omit such unnecessary jumps. > > > > I suggest you leave a blank line instead > > of deleting the goto. > > > > What is the point of the little bunny hop? > > regards, > dan carpenter > -ENOPARSE little bunny hop (though I could have said "just leave a blank line) I think that code blocks are more obvious to read. This is the original code: result = foo(); if (result) goto label; result = bar(); if (result) goto label; result = baz(); if (result) goto label; label: go on... He proposes: result = foo(); if (result) goto label; result = bar(); if (result) goto label; result = baz(); label: go on... I don't find the test->goto label; label: use offensive, but if he does, I think keeping a blank line in place of the test->goto might be better. result = foo(); if (result) goto label; result = bar(); if (result) goto label; result = baz(); label: go on... _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
