Re: [lustre-devel] [PATCH 21/40] staging: lustre: improve LNet clean up code and API

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello,

On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 3:59 PM, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Actually we're going to have to redo so much code that it's not worth it
> for me to review the rest of these patches.  Please just look over
> everything again:
>
>  BAD:   return -1;
> GOOD:   return -EINVAL;
>
>  BAD:  failed0:
> GOOD:  free_something:
>
>  BAD:   if (rc != 0)
> GOOD:   if (rc)

The latest suggestion is not correct,
from http://wiki.lustre.org/Lustre_Coding_Guidelines :
Conditional boolean (if (expr)), scalar (if (val != 0)) and pointer
(if (ptr != NULL)) expressions should be written consistently.

Thanks,

-- 
Alexander Zarochentsev
Seagate Technology, LLC
www.seagate.com
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux