This patch fixes the following warnings:-
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_object.c:926:22: warning: symbol 'lov_lsm_get' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_object.c:942:6: warning: symbol 'lov_lsm_put' was not declared. Should it be static?
Signed-off-by: Paul Davies C <pauldaviesc@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_object.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_object.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_object.c
index c7ff817..a667336 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_object.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_object.c
@@ -923,7 +923,7 @@ static struct lov_stripe_md *lov_lsm_addref(struct lov_object *lov)
return lsm;
}
-struct lov_stripe_md *lov_lsm_get(struct cl_object *clobj)
+static struct lov_stripe_md *lov_lsm_get(struct cl_object *clobj)
{
struct lu_object *luobj;
struct lov_stripe_md *lsm = NULL;
@@ -939,7 +939,7 @@ struct lov_stripe_md *lov_lsm_get(struct cl_object *clobj)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(lov_lsm_get);
-void lov_lsm_put(struct cl_object *unused, struct lov_stripe_md *lsm)
+static void lov_lsm_put(struct cl_object *unused, struct lov_stripe_md *lsm)
{
if (lsm != NULL)
lov_free_memmd(&lsm);
--
1.9.1
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
