On 11/20/15, Xose Vazquez Perez <xose.vazquez@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi, > > From https://lwn.net/Articles/662979/ > > --cut-- > Christoph complained a bit about the staging tree. He said that it > breaks allmodconfig builds, but that problem was evidently fixed a while > ago. He also dislikes the Lustre filesystem, which has been in staging > for some time now; Greg agreed and said that he would like to delete it. > It was generally agreed that the work being done on Lustre is not > substantial enough to justify its continued presence. Christoph also > said that the use of the staging tree for code that is about to be > deleted could be improved; there are, he said, people doing white-space > fixes on doomed code. > --end-- > > Could anyone clarify it? AFAIK, Intel is going to work more harder on Lustre code, so the best option would be to wait a bit. Agreed, checkpatch fixes are just a mess.. > > -thanks- > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list > devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel > -- Regards / Mit besten Grüßen, Denis _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
