On 14/11/15 09:28, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote: > On 11/14/2015 03:44 AM, Nizam Haider wrote: >> Fix simple typo in comments >> >> Signed-off-by: Nizam Haider <nijamh@xxxxxxx> > > Thanks for the patch. > >> --- >> drivers/staging/iio/iio_simple_dummy_buffer.c | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/staging/iio/iio_simple_dummy_buffer.c b/drivers/staging/iio/iio_simple_dummy_buffer.c >> index cf44a6f..c8f889b 100644 >> --- a/drivers/staging/iio/iio_simple_dummy_buffer.c >> +++ b/drivers/staging/iio/iio_simple_dummy_buffer.c >> @@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ static irqreturn_t iio_simple_dummy_trigger_h(int irq, void *p) >> * software scans: can be considered to be random access >> * so efficient reading is just a case of minimal bus >> * transactions. >> - * software culled hardware scans: >> + * software called hardware scans: > > I don't think that's a typo. The non-patched version makes a lot more sense > then the patched vesion. Yup, that's me using some 'more unusual' English terminology, Perhaps the word 'dropped' would be clearer. Also, that comment is now a little misleading as it is unusual / undesirable to now do this in an individual driver. The core demux code should take care of it. Hmm.. I'll make a note to reread the comments in that driver and see if any others could do with a refresh. Jonathan > >> * occasionally a driver may process the nearest hardware >> * scan to avoid storing elements that are not desired. This >> * is the fiddliest option by far. >> > _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
