Hi, 2015-11-09 16:57 GMT+09:00 Shailendra Verma <shailendra.v@xxxxxxxxxx>: > From: Shailendra Verma <Shailendra.v@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > The module end boundary check is not proper.The out of bound value > of module end can produce undesired results. > > Signed-off-by: Shailendra Verma <Shailendra.v@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Reviewed-by: Ravikant Bijendra Sharma <ravikant.s2@xxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > linux-4.3-rc6/arch/arm/mm/pageattr.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/linux-4.3-rc6/arch/arm/mm/pageattr.c b/linux-4.3-rc6/arch/arm/mm/pageattr.c > index cf30daf..be7fe4b 100644 > --- a/linux-4.3-rc6/arch/arm/mm/pageattr.c > +++ b/linux-4.3-rc6/arch/arm/mm/pageattr.c > @@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ static int change_memory_common(unsigned long addr, int numpages, > if (start < MODULES_VADDR || start >= MODULES_END) > return -EINVAL; > > - if (end < MODULES_VADDR || start >= MODULES_END) > + if (end < MODULES_VADDR || end >= MODULES_END) > return -EINVAL; > > data.set_mask = set_mask; > -- > 1.7.9.5 > Same patch with proper format is already submitted by Hillf. https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/5/3/202 Best Regards, Jungseung Lee _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
