On Friday 23 October 2015 16:51:13 Tony Cho wrote: > Hi Arnd, > First of all, I would like to say "thank you" for your efforts and > contributions. > We are updating the driver because new revision came up and making new > patches > to make it stable and elegant as Linux driver. In these days, we are > sending big changes > while testing such patches and also doing updates at once. > > As you did, we are scheduled to provide the patches making device tree > and delete all of platform > dependencies as you removed WILC_SDIO_IRQ_GPIO as well as other things. > So, I would like to > discuss with you for your series of patch. > > In this time, I think it's important to make the driver to be compiled > even if the link problem > happens as you reported. So, how about deleting all of SPI related files > from source tree and > even from Kconfig for the time being because new bus driver will come or > revert > the Kconfig and then can we expect the best patch in the near feature? > > I respect your efforts and patches, so your opinion is very important to me. Hi Tony, I've seen you have merged the patches that you mentioned into Greg's tree. I have now rebased my patches on top, including the separate SPI driver. Once we merge those, it should work fine, and having multiple front-end drivers gives a nice template for adding future hardware specific variations like another bus, or a newer model on the same bus. I'll post my patches after some more testing. Arnd _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
