On 02/11/15 14:25, ranjithece24@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
From: Ranjith <ranjithece24@xxxxxxxxx>
BIT macro is used for defining bit location instead of shifting
operator - coding style issue
Signed-off-by: Ranjith T <ranjithece24@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/addi_apci_1032.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/addi_apci_1032.c b/drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/addi_apci_1032.c
index b37166d..fd5ce21 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/addi_apci_1032.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/addi_apci_1032.c
@@ -85,8 +85,8 @@
#define APCI1032_STATUS_REG 0x0c
#define APCI1032_CTRL_REG 0x10
#define APCI1032_CTRL_INT_OR (0 << 1)
-#define APCI1032_CTRL_INT_AND (1 << 1)
-#define APCI1032_CTRL_INT_ENA (1 << 2)
+#define APCI1032_CTRL_INT_AND BIT(1)
+#define APCI1032_CTRL_INT_ENA BIT(2)
struct apci1032_private {
unsigned long amcc_iobase; /* base of AMCC I/O registers */
Hartley already fixed this coding style issue. It's in linux-next.
--
-=( Ian Abbott @ MEV Ltd. E-mail: <abbotti@xxxxxxxxx> )=-
-=( Web: http://www.mev.co.uk/ )=-
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
