On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 05:46:41PM +0900, Greg KH wrote: > On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 10:28:49AM -0400, ira.weiny@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > > From: Jubin John <jubin.john@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > Signed-off-by: Jubin John <jubin.john@xxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@xxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > drivers/staging/rdma/hfi1/common.h | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/rdma/hfi1/common.h b/drivers/staging/rdma/hfi1/common.h > > index 7809093eb55e..5dd92720faae 100644 > > --- a/drivers/staging/rdma/hfi1/common.h > > +++ b/drivers/staging/rdma/hfi1/common.h > > @@ -205,7 +205,7 @@ > > * to the driver itself, not the software interfaces it supports. > > */ > > #ifndef HFI1_DRIVER_VERSION_BASE > > -#define HFI1_DRIVER_VERSION_BASE "0.9-248" > > +#define HFI1_DRIVER_VERSION_BASE "0.9-294" > > Patches like this make no sense at all, please drop it and only use the > kernel version. What do you mean by "only use the kernel version"? Do you mean #define HFI1_DRIVER_VERSION_BASE UTS_RELEASE Or just remove the macro entirely? > > Trust me, it's going to get messy really fast (hint, it > already did...) Did I base this on the wrong tree? Not sure how this could have messed you up. Thanks, Ira _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel