Re: [PATCH] staging: octeon: fixed few coding style warnings

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/15/2015 06:40 AM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 09:09:04AM -0700, David Daney wrote:
and make sure you don't break the driver.

I'm not seeing how this patch breaks anything?  What am I missing?

Did you apply it and then compile the result? If not, then how can you assert that it does not break anything?

From SubmitChecklist item #2: "Builds cleanly ..."

I don't want to waste time considering patches that don't, at a minimum, meet this criterion. Other people may want to do the build testing, but I prefer that the patch submitter at least vet the patch enough that they can assert that it still builds cleanly.

David Daney

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux