On 5 October 2015 at 04:59, Dmitry Kalinkin <dmitry.kalinkin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The warning is a false positive.
>
That seems very likely.
Please could you role this into the original patch (vme: change bus
error handling scheme)?
Martyn
> drivers/vme/bridges/vme_tsi148.c: In function 'tsi148_master_write':
> drivers/vme/bridges/vme_tsi148.c:1358:31: warning: 'handler' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
> vme_unregister_error_handler(handler);
> ^
> drivers/vme/bridges/vme_tsi148.c: In function 'tsi148_master_read':
> drivers/vme/bridges/vme_tsi148.c:1260:31: warning: 'handler' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
> vme_unregister_error_handler(handler);
> ^
>
> Fixes: 0b0496625715 ("vme: change bus error handling scheme")
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Kalinkin <dmitry.kalinkin@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/vme/bridges/vme_tsi148.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/vme/bridges/vme_tsi148.c b/drivers/vme/bridges/vme_tsi148.c
> index d1e383b..6052483 100644
> --- a/drivers/vme/bridges/vme_tsi148.c
> +++ b/drivers/vme/bridges/vme_tsi148.c
> @@ -1186,7 +1186,7 @@ static ssize_t tsi148_master_read(struct vme_master_resource *image, void *buf,
> int retval, enabled;
> unsigned long long vme_base, size;
> u32 aspace, cycle, dwidth;
> - struct vme_error_handler *handler;
> + struct vme_error_handler *handler = NULL;
> struct vme_bridge *tsi148_bridge;
> void __iomem *addr = image->kern_base + offset;
> unsigned int done = 0;
> @@ -1276,7 +1276,7 @@ static ssize_t tsi148_master_write(struct vme_master_resource *image, void *buf,
> unsigned int done = 0;
> unsigned int count32;
>
> - struct vme_error_handler *handler;
> + struct vme_error_handler *handler = NULL;
> struct vme_bridge *tsi148_bridge;
> struct tsi148_driver *bridge;
>
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
