Olaf Hering <olaf@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Thu, Oct 08, KY Srinivasan wrote: > >> > yes, but after doing fcopy_respond_to_host(). I'd suggest we leave the >> > check in place, better safe than sorry. >> >> Agreed; Olaf, if it is ok with you, I can fix it up and send. > > I will retest with this part reverted. I think without two code paths > entering hv_fcopy_callback it should be ok to leave this check in. I think hv_fcopy_callback() is not involved here: we call fcopy_on_msg() every time userspace daemon writes to the device and it is not anyhow synchronized with host-guest communication. -- Vitaly _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
