On Oct 3, 2015, at 7:39 AM, Anjali Menon wrote: > Added a blank line after declaration to fix the coding > style warning detected by checkpatch.pl > > WARNING: Missing a blank line after declarations > > Signed-off-by: Anjali Menon <cse.anjalimenon@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/llite_capa.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/llite_capa.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/llite_capa.c > index aec9a44..a626871 100644 > --- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/llite_capa.c > +++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/llite_capa.c > @@ -140,6 +140,7 @@ static void sort_add_capa(struct obd_capa *ocapa, struct list_head *head) > static inline int obd_capa_open_count(struct obd_capa *oc) This whole file has been recently removed. In general at least with Lustre (and probably with other staging code) it's best to base your work on Greg's staging-next (or even staging-testing) tree because this is where the most up to date code is (And this is where Greg tries to apply it anyway). > { > struct ll_inode_info *lli = ll_i2info(oc->u.cli.inode); > + > return atomic_read(&lli->lli_open_count); > } > > -- > 1.9.1 > _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel