On Sep 25, 2015, at 12:09 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Friday 25 September 2015 01:39:49 Drokin, Oleg wrote: >> On Sep 24, 2015, at 9:07 PM, Drokin, Oleg wrote: >> >>> >>> On Sep 24, 2015, at 4:15 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >>>>>>> Anyway this does remove a lot of stuff that we don't really need in the client, >>>>>>> I'll try to get it built and tested just to make sure it does not really break anything >>>>>>> (unfortunately it does not seem to apply cleanly to the tip of staging-next tree). >>>>>> Ok. I based the patches on top of my 37 patch series, and if you want I can >>>>>> upload a git branch somewhere to make rebasing easier. >>>>> >>>>> That would be great. >>>>> Though in the end likely this huge patch would need to be split into smaller chunks. >>>>> Like if all unused llog code removal is done, that would allow subsequent dt_object.[ch] >>>>> removal and so on. >>>>> But for testing a current snapshot would be great, then I can run it through my testbed >>>>> to see how it fares there. >>>> >>>> Ok, I've pushed out the branch to >>>> >>>> git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arnd/playground.git y2038-lustre >>>> >>>> This contains the latest version of the y2038 series (with the warning fixed >>>> that Sudip Mukherjee found) but no other changes, and the big code removal >>>> on top. >>> >>> >>> These do seem to be working fine in my testing. >> >> Ah, and I should mention that just as I suspected, the debug log decoding tool >> is very unhappy. > > I have updated the branch now to reflect our discussions so far. Can you handle > forwarding the patches to Greg from there, or complain if there are still > problems with them? Aha, sure. Do you want me to send the y2038 patches too? > I still had problems with removing ptlrpc_update_export_timer(), so I left > a small patch for that, which you probably want to do differently, and > while I split out the nontrivial parts of the large removal patch, most of > it still is in one chunk that contains purely removals of whole lines. Ok, I'll take care of this as well. Thank you! Bye, Oleg _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel