On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 04:22:01PM +0000, KY Srinivasan wrote: > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Greg KH [mailto:gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] > > Sent: Sunday, September 20, 2015 10:28 PM > > To: KY Srinivasan <kys@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > > olaf@xxxxxxxxx; apw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; vkuznets@xxxxxxxxxx; > > jasowang@xxxxxxxxxx; Jake Oshins <jakeo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] drivers:hv: Export the API to invoke a hypercall on > > Hyper-V > > > > On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 06:26:48PM -0700, K. Y. Srinivasan wrote: > > > From: Jake Oshins <jakeo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > This patch exposes the function that hv_vmbus.ko uses to make hypercalls. > > This > > > is necessary for retargeting an interrupt when it is given a new affinity. > > > > > > Since we are exporting this API, rename the API as it will be visible outside > > > the hv.c file. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jake Oshins <jakeo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > Signed-off-by: K. Y. Srinivasan <kys@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > drivers/hv/hv.c | 9 +++++---- > > > include/linux/hyperv.h | 1 + > > > 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/hv/hv.c b/drivers/hv/hv.c > > > index 6341be8..a7b6c6a 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/hv/hv.c > > > +++ b/drivers/hv/hv.c > > > @@ -89,9 +89,9 @@ static int query_hypervisor_info(void) > > > } > > > > > > /* > > > - * do_hypercall- Invoke the specified hypercall > > > + * hv_do_hypercall- Invoke the specified hypercall > > > */ > > > -static u64 do_hypercall(u64 control, void *input, void *output) > > > +u64 hv_do_hypercall(u64 control, void *input, void *output) > > > { > > > u64 input_address = (input) ? virt_to_phys(input) : 0; > > > u64 output_address = (output) ? virt_to_phys(output) : 0; > > > @@ -132,6 +132,7 @@ static u64 do_hypercall(u64 control, void *input, > > void *output) > > > return hv_status_lo | ((u64)hv_status_hi << 32); > > > #endif /* !x86_64 */ > > > } > > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(hv_do_hypercall); > > > > > > #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64 > > > static cycle_t read_hv_clock_tsc(struct clocksource *arg) > > > @@ -329,7 +330,7 @@ int hv_post_message(union hv_connection_id > > connection_id, > > > aligned_msg->payload_size = payload_size; > > > memcpy((void *)aligned_msg->payload, payload, payload_size); > > > > > > - status = do_hypercall(HVCALL_POST_MESSAGE, aligned_msg, NULL) > > > + status = hv_do_hypercall(HVCALL_POST_MESSAGE, aligned_msg, > > NULL) > > > & 0xFFFF; > > > > > > put_cpu(); > > > @@ -347,7 +348,7 @@ u16 hv_signal_event(void *con_id) > > > { > > > u16 status; > > > > > > - status = (do_hypercall(HVCALL_SIGNAL_EVENT, con_id, NULL) & > > 0xFFFF); > > > + status = (hv_do_hypercall(HVCALL_SIGNAL_EVENT, con_id, NULL) & > > 0xFFFF); > > > > What's with the crazy () around a function call? > > I will address this and resend. > > > > And why are you passing a 64bit return value into a 16bit status value? > > That seems like something is broken. > > The low order 16 bits have the valid status codes we are interested in. Then why even return a 64bit number if no one uses it? greg k-h _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
