---
drivers/vme/bridges/vme_tsi148.c | 93 +++-----------------------------------
drivers/vme/vme.c | 86 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
drivers/vme/vme_bridge.h | 6 +++
3 files changed, 99 insertions(+), 86 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/vme/bridges/vme_tsi148.c b/drivers/vme/bridges/vme_tsi148.c
index fb1e7ad..c1f9385 100644
--- a/drivers/vme/bridges/vme_tsi148.c
+++ b/drivers/vme/bridges/vme_tsi148.c
@@ -169,7 +169,6 @@ static u32 tsi148_VERR_irqhandler(struct vme_bridge *tsi148_bridge)
unsigned int error_addr_high, error_addr_low;
unsigned long long error_addr;
u32 error_attrib;
- struct vme_bus_error *error = NULL;
struct tsi148_driver *bridge;
bridge = tsi148_bridge->driver_priv;
@@ -186,23 +185,12 @@ static u32 tsi148_VERR_irqhandler(struct vme_bridge *tsi148_bridge)
"Occurred\n");
}
- if (err_chk) {
- error = kmalloc(sizeof(struct vme_bus_error), GFP_ATOMIC);
- if (error) {
- error->address = error_addr;
- error->attributes = error_attrib;
- list_add_tail(&error->list, &tsi148_bridge->vme_errors);
- } else {
- dev_err(tsi148_bridge->parent,
- "Unable to alloc memory for VMEbus Error reporting\n");
- }
- }
-
- if (!error) {
+ if (err_chk)
+ vme_bus_error_handler(tsi148_bridge, error_addr, error_attrib);
+ else
dev_err(tsi148_bridge->parent,
"VME Bus Error at address: 0x%llx, attributes: %08x\n",
error_addr, error_attrib);
- }
/* Clear Status */
iowrite32be(TSI148_LCSR_VEAT_VESCL, bridge->base + TSI148_LCSR_VEAT);
@@ -483,73 +471,6 @@ static int tsi148_irq_generate(struct vme_bridge *tsi148_bridge, int level,
}
/*
- * Find the first error in this address range
- */
-static struct vme_bus_error *tsi148_find_error(struct vme_bridge *tsi148_bridge,
- u32 aspace, unsigned long long address, size_t count)
-{
- struct list_head *err_pos;
- struct vme_bus_error *vme_err, *valid = NULL;
- unsigned long long bound;
-
- bound = address + count;
-
- /*
- * XXX We are currently not looking at the address space when parsing
- * for errors. This is because parsing the Address Modifier Codes
- * is going to be quite resource intensive to do properly. We
- * should be OK just looking at the addresses and this is certainly
- * much better than what we had before.
- */
- err_pos = NULL;
- /* Iterate through errors */
- list_for_each(err_pos, &tsi148_bridge->vme_errors) {
- vme_err = list_entry(err_pos, struct vme_bus_error, list);
- if ((vme_err->address >= address) &&
- (vme_err->address < bound)) {
-
- valid = vme_err;
- break;
- }
- }
-
- return valid;
-}
-
-/*
- * Clear errors in the provided address range.
- */
-static void tsi148_clear_errors(struct vme_bridge *tsi148_bridge,
- u32 aspace, unsigned long long address, size_t count)
-{
- struct list_head *err_pos, *temp;
- struct vme_bus_error *vme_err;
- unsigned long long bound;
-
- bound = address + count;
-
- /*
- * XXX We are currently not looking at the address space when parsing
- * for errors. This is because parsing the Address Modifier Codes
- * is going to be quite resource intensive to do properly. We
- * should be OK just looking at the addresses and this is certainly
- * much better than what we had before.
- */
- err_pos = NULL;
- /* Iterate through errors */
- list_for_each_safe(err_pos, temp, &tsi148_bridge->vme_errors) {
- vme_err = list_entry(err_pos, struct vme_bus_error, list);
-
- if ((vme_err->address >= address) &&
- (vme_err->address < bound)) {
-
- list_del(err_pos);
- kfree(vme_err);
- }
- }
-}
-
-/*
* Initialize a slave window with the requested attributes.
*/
static int tsi148_slave_set(struct vme_slave_resource *image, int enabled,
@@ -1323,14 +1244,14 @@ out:
__tsi148_master_get(image, &enabled, &vme_base, &size, &aspace, &cycle,
&dwidth);
- vme_err = tsi148_find_error(tsi148_bridge, aspace, vme_base + offset,
+ vme_err = vme_find_error(tsi148_bridge, aspace, vme_base + offset,
count);
if (vme_err != NULL) {
dev_err(image->parent->parent, "First VME read error detected "
"an at address 0x%llx\n", vme_err->address);
retval = vme_err->address - (vme_base + offset);
/* Clear down save errors in this address range */
- tsi148_clear_errors(tsi148_bridge, aspace, vme_base + offset,
+ vme_clear_errors(tsi148_bridge, aspace, vme_base + offset,
count);
}
@@ -1422,14 +1343,14 @@ out:
ioread16(bridge->flush_image->kern_base + 0x7F000);
- vme_err = tsi148_find_error(tsi148_bridge, aspace, vme_base + offset,
+ vme_err = vme_find_error(tsi148_bridge, aspace, vme_base + offset,
count);
if (vme_err != NULL) {
dev_warn(tsi148_bridge->parent, "First VME write error detected"
" an at address 0x%llx\n", vme_err->address);
retval = vme_err->address - (vme_base + offset);
/* Clear down save errors in this address range */
- tsi148_clear_errors(tsi148_bridge, aspace, vme_base + offset,
+ vme_clear_errors(tsi148_bridge, aspace, vme_base + offset,
count);
}
diff --git a/drivers/vme/vme.c b/drivers/vme/vme.c
index 5670891..6803744 100644
--- a/drivers/vme/vme.c
+++ b/drivers/vme/vme.c
@@ -990,6 +990,92 @@ int vme_dma_free(struct vme_resource *resource)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(vme_dma_free);
+void vme_bus_error_handler(struct vme_bridge *bridge,
+ unsigned long long address, u32 attributes)
+{
+ struct vme_bus_error *error;
+
+ error = kmalloc(sizeof(struct vme_bus_error), GFP_ATOMIC);
+ if (error) {
+ error->address = address;
+ error->attributes = attributes;
+ list_add_tail(&error->list, &bridge->vme_errors);
+ } else {
+ dev_err(bridge->parent,
+ "Unable to alloc memory for VMEbus Error reporting\n");
+ }
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(vme_bus_error_handler);
+
+/*
+ * Find the first error in this address range
+ */
+struct vme_bus_error *vme_find_error(struct vme_bridge *bridge, u32 aspace,
+ unsigned long long address, size_t count)
+{
+ struct list_head *err_pos;
+ struct vme_bus_error *vme_err, *valid = NULL;
+ unsigned long long bound;
+
+ bound = address + count;
+
+ /*
+ * XXX We are currently not looking at the address space when parsing
+ * for errors. This is because parsing the Address Modifier Codes
+ * is going to be quite resource intensive to do properly. We
+ * should be OK just looking at the addresses and this is certainly
+ * much better than what we had before.
+ */
+ err_pos = NULL;
+ /* Iterate through errors */
+ list_for_each(err_pos, &bridge->vme_errors) {
+ vme_err = list_entry(err_pos, struct vme_bus_error, list);
+ if ((vme_err->address >= address) &&
+ (vme_err->address < bound)) {
+
+ valid = vme_err;
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+
+ return valid;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(vme_find_error);
+
+/*
+ * Clear errors in the provided address range.
+ */
+void vme_clear_errors(struct vme_bridge *bridge, u32 aspace,
+ unsigned long long address, size_t count)
+{
+ struct list_head *err_pos, *temp;
+ struct vme_bus_error *vme_err;
+ unsigned long long bound;
+
+ bound = address + count;
+
+ /*
+ * XXX We are currently not looking at the address space when parsing
+ * for errors. This is because parsing the Address Modifier Codes
+ * is going to be quite resource intensive to do properly. We
+ * should be OK just looking at the addresses and this is certainly
+ * much better than what we had before.
+ */
+ err_pos = NULL;
+ /* Iterate through errors */
+ list_for_each_safe(err_pos, temp, &bridge->vme_errors) {
+ vme_err = list_entry(err_pos, struct vme_bus_error, list);
+
+ if ((vme_err->address >= address) &&
+ (vme_err->address < bound)) {
+
+ list_del(err_pos);
+ kfree(vme_err);
+ }
+ }
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(vme_clear_errors);
+
void vme_irq_handler(struct vme_bridge *bridge, int level, int statid)
{
void (*call)(int, int, void *);
diff --git a/drivers/vme/vme_bridge.h b/drivers/vme/vme_bridge.h
index 934949a..d8d6b14 100644
--- a/drivers/vme/vme_bridge.h
+++ b/drivers/vme/vme_bridge.h
@@ -166,6 +166,12 @@ struct vme_bridge {
void *vaddr, dma_addr_t dma);
};
+void vme_bus_error_handler(struct vme_bridge *bridge,
+ unsigned long long address, u32 attributes);
+struct vme_bus_error *vme_find_error(struct vme_bridge *bridge, u32 aspace,
+ unsigned long long address, size_t count);
+void vme_clear_errors(struct vme_bridge *bridge, u32 aspace,
+ unsigned long long address, size_t count);
void vme_irq_handler(struct vme_bridge *, int, int);
int vme_register_bridge(struct vme_bridge *);
