Le 17/09/2015 10:50, Tony Cho a écrit :
> From: Leo Kim <leo.kim@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> This patch modify null check routine.
> - Null check error non return. (Handle_RcvdGnrlAsyncInfo)
It doesn't parse...
Is it fixing a bug? What were the consequences without the return?
Bye,
> Signed-off-by: Leo Kim <leo.kim@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Tony Cho <tony.cho@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/staging/wilc1000/host_interface.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/wilc1000/host_interface.c b/drivers/staging/wilc1000/host_interface.c
> index 6fdf392..a9eaa8f 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/wilc1000/host_interface.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/wilc1000/host_interface.c
> @@ -2403,8 +2403,10 @@ static s32 Handle_RcvdGnrlAsyncInfo(tstrWILC_WFIDrv *drvHandler, tstrRcvdGnrlAsy
> s32 s32Err = 0;
> tstrWILC_WFIDrv *pstrWFIDrv = (tstrWILC_WFIDrv *) drvHandler;
>
> - if (pstrWFIDrv == NULL)
> + if (!pstrWFIDrv) {
> PRINT_ER("Driver handler is NULL\n");
> + return -EFAULT;
> + }
> PRINT_D(GENERIC_DBG, "Current State = %d,Received state = %d\n", pstrWFIDrv->enuHostIFstate,
> pstrRcvdGnrlAsyncInfo->pu8Buffer[7]);
>
>
--
Nicolas Ferre
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
