Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] Staging: wilc1000: Use NULL instead of zero

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Why not the second one?
None of the line edited in first patch haven't changed after that.

On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 7:24 PM, Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 03:04:58PM +0530, Ronit Halder wrote:
>> This patch fixes the warning generated by sparse
>> "Using plain integer as NULL pointer" by using NULL
>> instead of zero.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ronit halder <ronit.crj@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>
>> v2: added a new patch in this patch series to fix the NULL comparison style
>
> This patch, and the second one, do not apply to my tree anymore :(
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux