On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 10:27:04AM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote: > On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 10:47:57AM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 10:00:43PM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote: > > > In cases where WILC_ERRORREPORT does not require cleanup actions, but > > > causes immediate return from the function it can be replaced with return > > > statement. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <mike.rapoport@xxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > Have you build tested? It introduces lots of build warnings. Your patch > > should never introduce build warnings. > > Yes, I've build tested and I'm aware of build warnings. They are fixed > later in the series, so that each patch will contain single logical > change. No, adding build warning is not allowed, even though you fix them in a later patch in a series. regards sudip _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
