On 2015년 09월 14일 13:25, Greg KH wrote:
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 10:29:26AM +0900, Tony Cho wrote:
On 2015년 09월 12일 11:35, Greg KH wrote:
On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 12:04:19PM +0900, Tony Cho wrote:
From: Glen Lee <glen.lee@xxxxxxxxx>
This patch removes a unused enum tenuFrameClass.
Signed-off-by: Glen Lee <glen.lee@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Tony Cho <tony.cho@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/staging/wilc1000/coreconfigurator.c | 8 --------
1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)
I already applied this, why resend it?
greg k-h
This is one of series for the "[PATCH v2 2/2] staging: wilc1000: coreconfigurator.c: remove unused function".
That's why it was sent to you.
But you sent it as a part of a different series, why do that?
When you do a v2 patch, please be specific, resend the whole series.
Otherwise how am I supposed to know what to do? Remember, I get
hundreds of patches to review and handle every day, you need to be very
obvious as to what I need to do otherwise I will get it wrong :)
greg k-h
Understood. I will keep it in my mind to be more obvious.
Thanks,
Tony.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
