On 4 September 2015 at 17:03, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Ulf,
>
> On Fri, 4 Sep 2015, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>> On 3 September 2015 at 15:35, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 2:53 PM, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >> On 17 June 2015 at 10:38, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >>> Add support for easy registering of one ore more platform devices that
>> >>> may:
>> >>> - need clocks that are described in DT,
>> >>> - be part of a PM Domain.
>> >
>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/board/board.c b/drivers/staging/board/board.c
>> >>> index 8712f566b31196e0..29d456e29f38feac 100644
>> >>> --- a/drivers/staging/board/board.c
>> >>> +++ b/drivers/staging/board/board.c
>> >
>> >>> +int __init board_staging_register_device(const struct board_staging_dev *dev)
>> >>> +{
>> >>> + struct platform_device *pdev = dev->pdev;
>> >>> + unsigned int i;
>> >>> + int error;
>> >>> +
>> >>> + pr_debug("Trying to register device %s\n", pdev->name);
>> >>> + if (board_staging_dt_node_available(pdev->resource,
>> >>> + pdev->num_resources)) {
>> >>> + pr_warn("Skipping %s, already in DT\n", pdev->name);
>> >>> + return -EEXIST;
>> >>> + }
>> >>> +
>> >>> + board_staging_gic_fixup_resources(pdev->resource, pdev->num_resources);
>> >>> +
>> >>> + for (i = 0; i < dev->nclocks; i++)
>> >>> + board_staging_register_clock(&dev->clocks[i]);
>> >>> +
>> >>> + error = platform_device_register(pdev);
>> >>> + if (error) {
>> >>> + pr_err("Failed to register device %s (%d)\n", pdev->name,
>> >>> + error);
>> >>> + return error;
>> >>> + }
>> >>> +
>> >>> + if (dev->domain)
>> >>> + __pm_genpd_name_add_device(dev->domain, &pdev->dev, NULL);
>> >>
>> >> Urgh, this managed to slip through my filters.
>> >>
>> >> It seems like we almost managed to remove all users of the
>> >> "..._name_add..." APIs for genpd. If hasn't been for $subject patch.
>> >> :-)
>> >>
>> >> Now, I realize this is already too late here, but let's try to fix
>> >> this before it turns into a bigger issue.
>> >>
>> >> Geert, do you think it's possible to convert into using the non-named
>> >> bases APIs?
>> >
>> > That will be difficult. This code is meant to use drivers that are not yet
>> > DT-aware on DT-based systems. Hence it uses platform devices with named PM
>> > domains, while the PM domains are described in DT.
>> > I don't think there's another way to look up a PM domain by name, is there?
>>
>> As a matter of fact there are, especially for those genpds that has
>> been created through DT as in this case. The API to use is
>> of_genpd_get_from_provider() to find the struct generic_pm_domain.
>
> Thanks!
>
>> Yes, I do realize that you need to manage the parsing of the domain
>> name to make sure it's the one you want, but I would rather keep that
>> "hack" in this driver than in the generic API.
>
> OK. It turned out not to be that complex, cfr. the patch below.
> For now this supports PM domains with "#power-domain-cells = <0>" only,
> but of course it can be extended if the need arises.
>
> I've also tried:
>
> np = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "renesas,sysc-rmobile");
> np = of_find_node_by_name(np, "a4lc");
>
> (the second step is needed because of the domain hierarchy in DT), but that
> would require adding the compatible string to struct board_staging_dev,
> and doesn't work if you have multiple identical power providers.
>
> I hope you like it?
>
> From 5fb11904845eb929a5b3382a9d5153c151cde1cf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2015 16:52:33 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH/RFC] staging: board: Migrate away from
> __pm_genpd_name_add_device()
>
> The named genpd APIs are deprecated. Hence convert the board staging
> code from using genpd names to DT node paths.
>
> For now this supports PM domains with "#power-domain-cells = <0>" only.
>
> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx>
Geert, thanks for posting this patch!
I wonder whether we could get this sent for the 4.3 rc[n], since that
would enable us to remove some of the named based API for genpd
through Rafael's linux-pm tree during this release cycle.
Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx>
Kind regards
Uffe
> ---
> drivers/staging/board/armadillo800eva.c | 2 +-
> drivers/staging/board/board.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 2 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/board/armadillo800eva.c b/drivers/staging/board/armadillo800eva.c
> index 0165591a52443c46..912c96b0536def7c 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/board/armadillo800eva.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/board/armadillo800eva.c
> @@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ static const struct board_staging_dev armadillo800eva_devices[] __initconst = {
> .pdev = &lcdc0_device,
> .clocks = lcdc0_clocks,
> .nclocks = ARRAY_SIZE(lcdc0_clocks),
> - .domain = "a4lc",
> + .domain = "/system-controller@e6180000/pm-domains/c5/a4lc@1"
> },
> };
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/board/board.c b/drivers/staging/board/board.c
> index 29d456e29f38feac..3eb5eb8f069c236d 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/board/board.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/board/board.c
> @@ -135,6 +135,40 @@ int __init board_staging_register_clock(const struct board_staging_clk *bsc)
> return error;
> }
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_GENERIC_DOMAINS_OF
> +static int board_staging_add_dev_domain(struct platform_device *pdev,
> + const char *domain)
> +{
> + struct of_phandle_args pd_args;
> + struct generic_pm_domain *pd;
> + struct device_node *np;
> +
> + np = of_find_node_by_path(domain);
> + if (!np) {
> + pr_err("Cannot find domain node %s\n", domain);
> + return -ENOENT;
> + }
> +
> + pd_args.np = np;
> + pd_args.args_count = 0;
> + pd = of_genpd_get_from_provider(&pd_args);
> + if (IS_ERR(pd)) {
> + pr_err("Cannot find genpd %s (%ld)\n", domain, PTR_ERR(pd));
> + return PTR_ERR(pd);
> +
> + }
> + pr_debug("Found genpd %s for device %s\n", pd->name, pdev->name);
> +
> + return pm_genpd_add_device(pd, &pdev->dev);
> +}
> +#else
> +static inline int board_staging_add_dev_domain(struct platform_device *pdev,
> + const char *domain)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> int __init board_staging_register_device(const struct board_staging_dev *dev)
> {
> struct platform_device *pdev = dev->pdev;
> @@ -161,7 +195,7 @@ int __init board_staging_register_device(const struct board_staging_dev *dev)
> }
>
> if (dev->domain)
> - __pm_genpd_name_add_device(dev->domain, &pdev->dev, NULL);
> + board_staging_add_dev_domain(pdev, dev->domain);
>
> return error;
> }
> --
> 1.9.1
>
> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
>
> Geert
>
> --
> Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
> when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
> -- Linus Torvalds
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
