Re: [PATCH 1/9] staging: most: NULL comparison style

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 12:00 PM, Sudip Mukherjee
<sudipm.mukherjee@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 01:31:00PM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 12:18 PM, Sudip Mukherjee
>> <sudipm.mukherjee@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > According to the kernel coding style the NULL check should not be
>> > written as [variable] == NULL or [variable] != NULL.
>>
>> It seems this not documented in Documentation/CodingStyle .
> Yes, it is not in the CodingStyle file. But mostly it is the convention
> that is followed. And in CodingStyle file if you see the "The rationale
> for using gotos is:" section, you will see in the example function the
> test is done like: if (!buffer).
> Anyways, frankly speaking I know commit message is bad but I could not
> think of anything else other than the one I wrote. Any ideas please...

Maybe something like:

Although not made explicit in Documentation/CodingStyle, there seems
to be a preference for writing NULL tests as 'if (!var)' rather than
if (var == NULL). The coding style does explicitly prefer brevity, so
convert all NULL checks to follow this shorter approach.

Frans
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux