> A: these and other similar errors: > > In file included from ../drivers/staging/hfi1/chip.c:61:0: > ../drivers/staging/hfi1/chip.c: In function â__hfi1_trace_LINKVERBâ: > ../drivers/staging/hfi1/trace.h:1357:20: error: function > â__hfi1_trace_LINKVERBâ can never be inlined because it uses variable > argument lists static inline void __hfi1_trace_##fn(const char *func, char > *fmt, ...) \ > This was corrected with https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-rdma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg27221.html, which I think Doug has picked up. Doug, Randy, Stephen how do we want to handle fixing drivers/staging/hfi1 via the staging list vs. the linux-rdma list? > B: When CONFIG_PCI is not enabled, lots of these errors: > The driver used to get a gift from the drivers/infiniband/hw/Kconfig, which has the required PCI dependency. The infiniband dependency is also similarly missing and was resolved via the following temporary patch: https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-rdma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg26989.html This one also needs to be similarly added for that 0-day build issue. I have submitted to both lists https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-rdma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg27299.html assuming the above one as a dependency. > In file included from ../drivers/staging/hfi1/chip.c:60:0: > ../drivers/staging/hfi1/hfi.h:508:20: error: field âmsixâ has incomplete > type > struct msix_entry msix; > ^ > > ../drivers/staging/hfi1/chip.c: In function âdisable_intxâ: > ../drivers/staging/hfi1/chip.c:8667:2: error: implicit declaration of function > âpci_intxâ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > pci_intx(pdev, 0); > ^ > > so the driver should depend on PCI or maybe even PCI_MSI. > > C. Please provide some contact info, e.g. in a TODO file or the MAINTAINERS > file. > I have submitted https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-rdma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg27298.html to both lists to add a maintainer. Mike _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel