On Sat, Aug 01, 2015 at 08:55:09AM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > On Sat, Aug 01, 2015 at 09:36:19AM -0400, Neil Horman wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 09:41:10PM -0400, Neil Horman wrote: > > > On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 06:56:33PM -0400, Benjamin Romer wrote: > > > > From: Neil Horman <nhorman@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > > Switch the visornic over to use napi. Currently there is a kernel > > > > thread > > > > that sits and waits on a wait queue to get notified of incoming virtual > > > > interrupts. It would be nice if we could handle frame reception using > > > > the > > > > standard napi processing instead. This patch creates our napi instance > > > > and has the rx thread schedule it > > > > > > > > Given that the unisys hypervisor currently requires that queue servicing > > > > be done by a polling loop that wakes up every 2ms, lets instead also > > > > convert that to a timer, which is simpler, and allows us to remove all > > > > the thread starting and stopping code. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Signed-off-by: Benjamin Romer <benjamin.romer@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > I assume you just didn't copy me on patch 1/2? I don't see it anywhere. > > > > > > Neil > > > > > > > Sorry, scratch that, it just showed up late. > > > > for the series: > > Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Why are you acking a series that you already signed off on? That seems > redundant... > I suppose it is, but it always strikes me as a bit out of place when someone else posts patches for you, so I thought you might like to know this was in fact mine, so I acked it. Feel free to ignore it. Neil _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
