Re: [PATCH V2 1/5] staging: wilc1000: #ifdef conditionals cover entire functions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 06:10:10PM +0900, Tony Cho wrote:
> This patch lets preprocessor conditionals (#ifdef) related to
> WILC_SDIO_IRQ_GPIO to compile out the entire functions. Compiling out
> the entire functions is preferred rather than portions of functions or
> expressions becausue doing so makes code harder to read.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tony Cho <tony.cho@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
<snip>
>  
> +#ifdef WILC_SDIO_IRQ_GPIO
>  static int sdio_clear_int(void)
>  {
> -#ifndef WILC_SDIO_IRQ_GPIO
> -	/* uint32_t sts; */
> -	sdio_cmd52_t cmd;
> -
> -	cmd.read_write = 0;
> -	cmd.function = 1;
> -	cmd.raw = 0;
> -	cmd.address = 0x4;
> -	cmd.data = 0;
> -	g_sdio.sdio_cmd52(&cmd);
> -	int_clrd++;
> -
> -	return cmd.data;
> -#else
>  	uint32_t reg;
>  
>  	if (!sdio_read_reg(WILC_HOST_RX_CTRL_0, &reg)) {
> @@ -181,9 +168,23 @@ static int sdio_clear_int(void)
>  	sdio_write_reg(WILC_HOST_RX_CTRL_0, reg);
>  	int_clrd++;
>  	return 1;
> -#endif
> +}
> +#else
> +static int sdio_clear_int(void)
> +{
> +	sdio_cmd52_t cmd;
> +
> +	cmd.read_write = 0;
> +	cmd.function = 1;
> +	cmd.raw = 0;
> +	cmd.address = 0x4;
> +	cmd.data = 0;
> +	g_sdio.sdio_cmd52(&cmd);
> +	int_clrd++;
>  
> +	return cmd.data;
>  }
> +#endif /* WILC_SDIO_IRQ_GPIO */
instead of changing #ifndef to #ifdef i think the following would have
been easier:

diff --git a/drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_sdio.c b/drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_sdio.c
index 5a18148..5cd4d45 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_sdio.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_sdio.c
@@ -155,9 +155,9 @@ _fail_:
 	return 0;
 }
 
+#ifndef WILC_SDIO_IRQ_GPIO
 static int sdio_clear_int(void)
 {
-#ifndef WILC_SDIO_IRQ_GPIO
 	/* uint32_t sts; */
 	sdio_cmd52_t cmd;
 
@@ -170,7 +170,10 @@ static int sdio_clear_int(void)
 	int_clrd++;
 
 	return cmd.data;
+}
 #else
+static int sdio_clear_int(void)
+{
 	uint32_t reg;
 
 	if (!sdio_read_reg(WILC_HOST_RX_CTRL_0, &reg)) {
@@ -181,9 +184,8 @@ static int sdio_clear_int(void)
 	sdio_write_reg(WILC_HOST_RX_CTRL_0, reg);
 	int_clrd++;
 	return 1;
-#endif
-
 }
+#endif
 
 uint32_t sdio_xfer_cnt(void)
 {

>  
>  uint32_t sdio_xfer_cnt(void)
<snip>
> +#ifdef WILC_SDIO_IRQ_GPIO
>  static int sdio_clear_int_ext(uint32_t val)
>  {
>  	int ret;
>  
> -	if (g_sdio.has_thrpt_enh3) {
> +	if(g_sdio.has_thrpt_enh3) {
why changing this? The original style is according to the kernel coding
style.

regards
sudip
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux