RE: [PATCH 2/6] staging: unisys: visornic - prevent lock recursion after IO recovery

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dan Carpenter [mailto:dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2015 4:28 AM
> To: Romer, Benjamin M
> Cc: gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx; *S-Par-
> Maintainer; driverdev-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Sell, Timothy C
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] staging: unisys: visornic - prevent lock recursion
> after IO recovery
> 
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 12:29:07PM -0400, Benjamin Romer wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/unisys/visornic/visornic_main.c
> b/drivers/staging/unisys/visornic/visornic_main.c
> > index 18b0465..d5095c9 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/unisys/visornic/visornic_main.c
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/unisys/visornic/visornic_main.c
> > @@ -417,6 +417,7 @@ visornic_serverdown(struct visornic_devdata
> *devdata,
> >  		}
> >  		devdata->server_change_state = true;
> >  		devdata->server_down_complete_func = complete_func;
> > +		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&devdata->priv_lock, flags);
> >  		visornic_serverdown_complete(devdata);
> >  	} else if (devdata->server_change_state) {
> >  		dev_dbg(&devdata->dev->device, "%s changing state\n",
> > @@ -424,7 +425,6 @@ visornic_serverdown(struct visornic_devdata
> *devdata,
> >  		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&devdata->priv_lock, flags);
> >  		return -EINVAL;
> >  	}
> > -	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&devdata->priv_lock, flags);
> >  	return 0;
> 
> Don't we still need a spin_unlock if devdata->server_down is true and
> devdata->server_change_state is false?  Or can that not happen?
> 
> A naive reading of the function implies that it can.  I checked to see
> if Smatch would have complained here, and it only complains if when
> --spammy is enabled.  These warnings have a too high false positive
> ratio for normal people.
> 
> regards,
> dan carpenter

Yikes.. you're exactly right Dan; I can't believe I missed that!  Thanks.

I will re-submit with the appropriate correction, i.e.:
@@ -410,7 +410,8 @@ visornic_serverdown(struct visornic_devdata *devdata,
                        __func__);
                spin_unlock_irqrestore(&devdata->priv_lock, flags);
                return -EINVAL;
-       }
+       } else
+               spin_unlock_irqrestore(&devdata->priv_lock, flags);
        return 0;
 }

Tim Sell
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux